Energy sources. What would you like to see?

Gwynne

Sorry I only have 5 so if you prefer something else say so.

Yesterday my husband and I got in a rather heated debate about what energy source we would prefer to use. I am not interested in what you do not like, I am curious about what you do like.

If you select coal, how would you deal with the environmental factors and dangers to miners?

If you select Nuclear, how would you deal with the waste? Including the heated water?

If you prefer Solar, how would you deal with the huge requirements of space and the requirement of sunny weather?

If you prefer Wind, how would you deal with the fact that it does not work in all regions and it's dependence on the weather?

If you prefer hydroelectric, how would you deal with the impact on aquatic life?

If you prefer Natural Gas, how would you deal with the emissions and the environmental impact of the pipeline?

If you prefer biofuels, how would you deal with the environmental impact of huge areas growing only one type of plant and the fact that it still needs fossil fuels?

And if you would prefer Geothermal, how would you deal with the potential of the wells being depleted and its high startup cost?

Sorry this is so long, I would love to get a debate going on each of these. I am really interested in some new ideas.

411 views • 0 upvotes • 43 comments

COMMENT (43)

Ap

Posted at
The thing is, in reality we can use a mix of hydroelectric, wind, and solar. We don't have to pick one.

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
Yes they do talk about offshore wind power, the biggest negitive I saw to that was low efficiency and high cost, but I think it would make sense in some areas.

👻

👻 Siena 🌹 • Aug 8, 2015
Yeah that wouldn't go down well here. So difficult to find something. Can you put wind turbines out at sea? I'm grasping 😊

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
Were we are we have alot of dams. It has had a very bad impact on our fish. We actually have an ancient fish going extinct because dams have greatly hindered their breeding. I think dams are my least favorite solution.

Ti

Posted at
There's actually plenty of space in Northern Africa for solar power. It would also create jobs and help the economies there to build them. And there would be enough space for clean energy for the world. And that whole process is ready to start whenever we're ready.

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
so it doesn't pay for itself yet, but might in the future. That was neat to see, thanks for bringing it up.

👻

👻 Siena 🌹 • Aug 8, 2015
Cheers Amber.

Am

Amber • Aug 8, 2015
For the battery options ya'll might be interested in the Tesla PowerWall video. I am saving up for some solar panels and want one of these suckers 😊

Ti

Posted at
However nuclear is dangerous and radiation takes years upon years to go away. And if it contaminated an ocean radiation spreads like crazy. 

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
Yeah I like nuclear power, the real problem with it is the waste

Ti

Tij🌸 • Aug 8, 2015
Ahh I knew that fact about radiation in small amounts, but I still have this (semi irrational.. Okay very irrational) concern of a nuclear apocalypse hahaha

Ti

Tij🌸 • Aug 8, 2015
Lol, I'm just hella scared of radiation tbh, but it's definitely something to be considered.

La

Posted at
I don't personally have it because I don't own a home yet. But having solar panels where I'm from in Australia is a big thing. Most people have them on their roof and because they are producing their own power don't have to pay bills. They can sell what they have back to the energy companies for profit.

Am

Posted at
I think the preferred or best solution will vary by region. Iceland for  example has an abundance of geothermal. I live in a desert so solar makes sense (but the extreme heat affects efficiency of solar panels). For my area I am a fan of the solar heat transfer: super heats salt to a molten level, allowing a heat exchange to generate energy not only during the day but into the night as well. From what I understand it is more efficient with higher yields for the same sqft than solar panels. 

Am

Amber • Aug 8, 2015
There are down sides, uses a lot of mirrors and affects bird migrations; the mirror concentration can burn bird feathers in flight.... It was an unforeseen issue that is now considered with future plants

Am

Amber • Aug 8, 2015
There is the Andasol Plant in Spain and the Solana plant in Arizona. I think one is in the works for Nevada too

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
This is the first I have heard of this, that sounds really cool

Fe

Posted at
This is where it's able to be. The limited areas are for plants.

Fe

Fe • Aug 8, 2015
They are studying how to combat the running out, i think when it's done at a larger scale is when it becomes a problem. not so much when it's just a consumer using it

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
This is neat. But the, little research I did still talked about it being depleted. My FIL does also use geothermal, and has a underground house. He loves it. but if they can run out, then we are just kicking the problem down the road.

Fe

Posted at
Geothermal

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
sorry, it is only available on limited areas and has the potential to deplete. then what?

Gw

Gwynne • Aug 8, 2015
Yes but it is only available is linm

Ti

Tij🌸 • Aug 8, 2015
What's that?:)

Fe

Posted at
As far as costs it seems to be getting cheaper

Ab

Posted at
I have no clue 😳