Would you consider a child after a chemical pregnancy a rainbow pregnancy?

Ive had chemicals between 4-6 weeks pregnant, 4 times. Ive had someone tell me i had no right to call my baby a rainbow. I understand that chemical pregnancy is more the loss of a pregnancy rather than a baby as most chemicals are lost around your period and never had a chance to really implant or grow or form into a baby. I understand that aspect. But honestly at least the way i view it is that when any of us get pregnant we hope/expect in 9 months to have a child. Chemical pregnancies felt like they took what should have ended up as a baby away. Some of us fall in love the day we get a positive. So would a child be considered at least in yalls opinion a rainbow baby or is the person who told me it was wrong to use that term right?