*Sensitive topic* At what point is (or isn’t) involuntary institutionalization necessary?
Content warning: this topic involves mental health, involuntary institutionalization, and potential discussion of suicide, self harm, substance abuse, and eating disorders.
In my time on the internet, I’ve ended up either following or keeping an eye on different people and accounts who seem to be in some unhealthy situations, or at least are believed to be. The general consensus of those who also follow these people’s stories is that they need to be involuntarily committed to a mental health institution. The reasons can range from drug use, eating disorders, or perceived delusions and mental instability.
While I understand and can appreciate the concern people have for others and their well-being, it makes me consider the ethical implications of involuntary institutionalization. This can be a necessary tool for social services and the safety of some individuals, however, I think people take it very lightly. It’s a big deal to take away someone’s autonomy and I wonder where we draw the line between allowing someone to make their own choices, and declaring them incapable of making safe decisions for themselves.
Have you witnessed or experienced people thinking someone they view on social media platforms should be involuntarily committed, when you think it may be a step too far? Or do you think this is something that isn’t done enough? I’m wondering about other peoples thoughts.
Let's Glow!
Achieve your health goals from period to parenting.