Which would cost more?

Question

The Ganesha would be on my ribs not my hand but probably about that size. I’m pretty small so it wouldn’t be all that big.
UPDATE: I will be getting both of these just doing the cheaper one first. Also I have been to india and it has a huuggeee impact and meaning in my life hence why I’m getting the tattoo.

Answer

I would recommend against any religious imagery if you are not an active member of that religion (idk if you are, just saying if you’re not). The flowers are beautiful

Answer

I’m sorry but “I’ve been to India” is a kindof weird reason to get someones (well millions of someones lol) religious image tattooed on you. Take it from someone who has a religious symbol of a religion I’m not in tattooed on them 😬 it feels v dorky and cringey years later because it is 🤷🏻‍♀️

Answer

It all depends on the artist and their specialty, how much they charge per hour and how quickly or slowly they tattoo. I have flowers similar to that on my leg, but wayy bigger. With tip, it ended up being about $1,000...and she cut me a deal because I'm a regular. I could see that elephant costing more than the flowers though because of all the detail work, and that design uses both white and black ink, rather than just shades of black like the flowers. You should really go with whichever tattoo you like better though, not go based on price. That's how people end up with shitty work.

Answer

(/:(

Answer

The flowers will by far be quicker, and artists charge per hour.

Answer

I think the 2nd one would cost more but it never hurts to go and talk to a tattoo artist. Show them your pictures and ideas, and ask how much he/she thinks it'll bea

Answer

It honestly depends on where you go and if you stick to that size, but for both I would say a minimum of $200-$250

Which would cost more?

Let’s Glow

Glow is here for you on your path to pregnancy

25+ million

4.8 stars

20+

Getting Pregnant

Pregnancy

1st Year (Baby & You)

Baby Products