Who should have lost their job?

Question

So at a place of employment, security cameras on the property's parking lots reveal two people - a man and woman - going into a car and then coming out, the woman seen putting her pants back on. Obviously they had sex in the car. They are both employees at the company, the man an SIV from Iraq married with two young daughters, and the statuses of the woman unknown.

The proper authority of the facility met and discussed with both parties involved. The man would meet with the female coworker on HIS lunch break to have sex in his vehicle.

Who should be fired?

ACTUAL RESULTS: The woman was fired because she was stepping out of clocked-in work hours to have sex, then obviously collects the time on the paycheck come payday. The man was not because he was doing this on his lunch break.

Do you think this was fair?

Personally I thought it would be appropriate to just fire both. Especially since adultery may very well still be a criminal offense in VA, which the man committed. But overall a poor work ethic.

Do you think the man's status as a SIV (similar entry and financial needs as a refugee - employed after support of a charity so the employers know the living situation) had a potential impact on their decision to keep him?

Answer

If they were having sex while one the clock, yes, fire them both. 
I think t is up to the business owner if they want to fire them for having sex on company grounds. 
But as far as the man being married, I don't feel he should be fired for personal choices outside of work if they do not effect the company in any way.

Answer

I said just the women because she was on the clock. He was not.  Now if she was not on the clock than neither of them should have been. What someone does on their break should not matter to the employer. If only should of they are stealing.

Answer

Depends on company policy. According the information provided in this story, on the woman should rightfully be fired. She was on the clock and yet she was abusing that time she was supposed to be spending inside doing her job. The man would have no reason of being fired. He was off the clock on his break. What he does on his break time is his business. It's not about the fact they had sex at all. It's about abusing the companies time and money.

Answer

Both. Why would one be and not the other? Kind of messed up.

Answer

I would assume this breaks the Code of Conduct that both employees agreed to. Because of that, both employees.

Even though they had sex in a vehicle not owned by the company, it was still on company property, therefore all organizational policies would also extend to the vehicle.

Answer

Both because having sex in the parking lot is probably illegal to begin with?

Answer

Both of them.

Yes, the woman was doing it while on the clock, but they were both doing it in the car. It is unprofessional. Would that be considered indecent exposure if they were caught as well?

Answer

I always thought sex on the job was unethical. 🤷🏻‍♀️ I get confused because I watch a lot of 'Grey's Anatomy'. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Answer

As an employer,  the women,  she was stealing company  time.
Was it unprofessional for both? Yes
Would  it be any of my business? No
Same would  have been if  they were  merely  just talking in the car,  she was "working" he was not.

Answer

The woman for sure needed to get fired but the guy also needed to get reprimanded for having inappropriate behavio,having sex on the company's property!!

Who should have lost their job?

Let’s Glow

Glow is here for you on your path to pregnancy

25+ million

4.8 stars

20+

Getting Pregnant

Pregnancy

1st Year (Baby & You)

Baby Products