Should the RSPCA be held accountable?

Question

So yesterday in Perth, it got up to 39.1°C (102°F).
A company in Canning Vale keeps their guard dogs locked in a tin shed during the day. Yesterday was no different.
The RSPCA was called, but they weren’t interested. They were called multiple times again, and didn’t attend the property until later on in the day (I believe someone told them they were breaching the animal welfare act, but don’t quote me on it) and then rescued the dogs.
They later returned the dogs to the company.
I think we can all agree that the dogs were treated poorly and their owners should be punished, but should the RSPCA be held accountable for anything?

Answer

Isnt it their job to uphold the welfare of animals? This would b the equivalent to human resources ignoring staff complaints on over working or misconduct.

Answer

Ugh, I hate animal cruelty isn’t taken seriously! If something happens to those dogs, yes they absolutely should be held accountable.

Answer

The RSPCA (eventually) rescued the dogs, therefore what could the RSPCA possibly be “accountable” for?

Answer

Of course they should. They have a job to do and they’re not doing it and animals are suffering because of it. Assholes.

Answer

The animal recuse place in my area is pretty much the same. They almost never do anything and when/if they do the owner usually gets the animals returned.

Should the RSPCA be held accountable?

The Top Baby Tracker App: Embrace New Beginnings with Tender Care

The Top Fertility Tracker App: Your Path to Achieving Pregnancy

The Top Pregnancy App: Nurturing Your Journey to Motherhood

The Top Period Tracker for Empowering Your Menstrual Health Journey