If assault riffles were to be banned, should police even have access to them?
So here we are again with another mass shooting. I’ve began to notice a pattern. People don’t think assault riffles should be for public use and keep saying it should only be available for trained professionals or people within the police force or military.
My question is, if assault riffles were to banned for civilian use, why should police have them?
Bonus: why would anyone for that matter not actually in war need an assault riffle anyway? Shouldn’t that be limited to only times of war?
Vote below to see results!
Comment
Let’s Glow
Glow is here for you on your path to pregnancy
Glow helps you navigate your fertility journey with smart tools, personalized insights, and guidance from medical experts who understand what matters most.
25+ million
Users
4.8 stars
200k+ app ratings
20+
Medical advisors
